Call for Papers: The Triumph of the Therapeutic Revisited: The Politics of Self-Care and Self-Improvement in Contemporary American Culture
Guest editors: Alexandra Bacalu & Dragoș Manea

The rising popularity and speedy proliferation of social media in the 2010s and 2020s has resulted in the revival of a large-scale cultural interest in self-care and self-help—now reconceptualized as digital practices of self-improvement and virtual means of performing individual authenticity, in the context of increasingly blurred boundaries between the public and the private. This concern with caring for the self and preserving mental health has only peaked during moments of political crisis and social unrest, with the 2016 and 2024 elections of Donald Trump, the 2020 global pandemic, and the recent conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East being repeatedly referenced in popular discussions around the—highly debatable—therapeutic need for occasional political disengagement. The birth of the sociological study of therapeutic culture(s) in the 1960s and 1970s coincided with the recognition of America as a particularly intriguing case-study on the Western “triumph of the therapeutic” (Rieff 1966), especially considering its open-armed welcoming of Freudian ideas in the post-war period or the rise of spiritual self-actualization fads that followed the deeply politically-engaged Civil Rights era (see Berger 1965; Lasch 1979; Lears 1983). Indeed, American culture offers an impressive collection of key contexts in the history of the larger Western concern with therapy and self-development. A rough survey of these might include: Puritan self-examination and self-discipline in seventeenth-century New England; Transcendentalist articulations of self-reliance and nonconformity; the clinical reception of Freudian psychoanalysis in the twentieth century; Audre Lorde’s articulation of self-care as an act of radical political warfare; US social media influencers and the popularity of Stoic self-help in the Manosphere; among others. We invite papers that reflect on the political, social, philosophical, and ethical dimensions of self-care—and its many cognates—in any aspect of contemporary American literature and culture. This special issue explores questions such as: In what ways are contemporary notions of self-care politically engaged or politically neutral? How can we (re)conceptualize self-care as a politically-loaded set of cultural practices that necessarily include the care of the other? How can the pursuit of individual happiness and self-actualization be made compatible with active political engagement in the popular imagination? How is the human body visually constructed via representations of self-care on digital and social media platforms? How are self-care practices involved in the cultural representation of race, ethnicity, class, gender identity, and sexual orientation? To what extent can contemporary representations of individual self-improvement make room for a more nuanced account of human vulnerability in the context of widespread neoliberal narratives of undefeatable individual resilience?
——
Please send all inquiries and proposals (a title, 300-word abstract, and 100-word bio) to Dragoș
Manea at dragos.manea@lls.unibuc.ro and Alexandra Bacalu at alexandra.bacalu@lls.unibuc.ro.
The deadline for proposals is June 25, 2026. The deadline for articles between 4,000 and 8,000 words is October 30, 2026. All texts should be written in accordance with the 9th edition of the MLA citation style.

---

[Inter]sections is the online open-access double-blind peer-reviewed journal of the American Studies Program at the University of Bucharest (www.intersections-journal.com).  It is indexed in the MLA Directory of Periodicals, Ulrichsweb, DOAJ, CEEOL, EBSCO, and ERIH PLUS.

Please find more instructions for the submission process below:

Papers should be between 4,000 and 8,000 words (for book reviews, the suggested length is between 1,000 and 3,000 words), and written in accordance with the 9th edition of the MLA citation style. All submissions should also include an 300-word abstract, a list of 5-7 keywords, and a short bio. Alternately, you may wish to fill in the following submission form:

Name:

Affiliation:

Bio (no more than 100 words):

E-mail address:

Title of Submission:

Abstract (no more than 300 words):

Keywords (5-7):

Unless you are submitting work for a special issue, please e-mail all submissions, queries, and comments to intersections@americanstudies.ro.

After sending your submission, you receive a confirmation of receipt, and our peer-reviewing team gets a blind copy for review. Ideally, it should take us no more than 1 or 2 months to review your submission, but – depending on the volume of submissions – this may take longer.

Please also note the following:

• Papers which have been previously submitted for seminars, workshops and lectures, as well as chapters of diploma papers/dissertations can be submitted for publication. However, papers which have already been published will not be accepted unless you have secured permission from the initial publishers.
• Please note that your submission shall be rejected should it be very negligently written (poor English language skills, sub-standard spelling or punctuation) or should its citation style be so far from the MLA style that it requires an unreasonable amount of editing.
• Photographs and other images can be inserted in the article, but only if they are relevantly discussed within the body of your paper. Should your paper include images, please make sure the reproduction of the image does not infringe upon current copyright norms and/or secure copyright from the copyright owner.

PLAGIARISM

• [Inter]sections does not condone plagiarism. Should any part of your paper be plagiarized, your paper shall be returned to you and you will be asked not to submit material for publication in [Inter]sections again.
• We carefully screen all of our submissions for plagiarism by using the academic software provided by the University of Bucharest, www.sistemantiplagiat.ro, as well as other online detection tools, such as DupliChecker and CopyLeaks.